As a minimum common frame of reference for good research practices (notwithstanding other frameworks), ”la Caixa” Foundation adopts the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ALLEA), code which all research and innovation activities conduc ted with funding from our organisation must respect.
As set out in the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ALLEA), good research practices are based on fundamental principles of integrity. They guide researchers in their work as well as in their engagement with the practical, ethical and intellectual challenges inherent in research.
These principles are:
-
Reliability in ensuring the quality of research, reflected in the design, the methodology, the analysis and the use of resources.
-
Honesty in developing, undertaking, reviewing, reporting and communicating research in a transparent, fair, full and unbiased way.
-
Respect for colleagues, research participants, society, ecosystems, cultural heritage and the environment.
-
Accountability for the research from idea to publication, for its management and organisation, for training, supervision and mentoring, and for its wider impacts.
Good practices in research include areas such as the promotion of an adequate work environment, the establishment of appropriate dynamics on training, mentoring and supervision, adequate data management and research, publication, dissemination and auditing procedures, among others.
Research misconduct is traditionally defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (known as the FFP categorisation) in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results:
-
Fabrication is making up results and recording them as if they were real.
-
Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment or processes or changing, omitting or suppressing data or results without justification.
-
Plagiarism is using other people’s work and ideas without giving proper credit to the original source, thus violating the rights of the original author(s) to their intellectual outputs.
These are just three of the most usual forms of misconduct, but unfortunately there are many others that must also be avoided, in particular the violation of professional, legal and ethical responsibilities. Examples of such unacceptable practices include biases in the independence of studies, exaggerating findings, lack of scientific rigour, collaborating with abusive publications, breaching duties of confidentiality, misuse of personal data, violating the rights of people and/or animals in research and failure to respect the environment, etc.
The collaboration of all agents involved is essential in detecting and combatting cases of misconduct. Thus, anyone having knowledge of improper conduct in research of any nature must report it, in the first place, to the heads of their centre who in turn will notify ”la Caixa” Foundation, should the conduct be related, directly or indirectly, or may have an effect, directly or indirectly, on the project that has received or is receiving support from our institution (even if the conducts were committed prior to the call to which the project was submitted) (hereinafter, a “Misconduct”). The ”la Caixa” Foundation contact person will be the corresponding project manager. Likewise, if ”la Caixa” Foundation were to receive information about possible Misconducts carried out in the framework of a project receiving support from the Foundation, it will inform the organization responsible for the project.